The following matter is a summary of a case brought to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) by Rohan Davis.

The Victorian Institute of Teaching (VIT) welcomes the decision of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) in the matter of Rohan Davis v Victorian Institute of Teaching, which affirms the Institute’s refusal to renew Mr Davis’ registration as a teacher.

In particular, VCAT notes that teachers are held to a high level of accountability. They are expected to maintain a high level of professionalism, not only in their interactions with students, but also to engage with colleagues, parents, and regulatory bodies in a reasonable and professional manner.

In October 2022, VIT received a reportable conduct notification regarding an incident at Mr Davis’ school involving two male students. It was alleged that Mr Davis shouted at a 14-year-old student and pushed him twice in the classroom.

Following VIT’s assessment, VIT refused Mr Davis’ application for renewal on 13 February 2024. The decision was based on findings that Mr Davis had engaged in category C conduct, had not demonstrated suitability to teach, and that his character was such that it would not be in the public interest to allow him to continue teaching.  

The VIT clarified that Mr Davis’ ADHD diagnosis was not a factor in the refusal, following receipt of supporting documentation from his psychiatrist.

Mr Davis sought a review of the decision at VCAT in March 2024. The matter was heard across three dates in early 2025. In its decision, VCAT accepted that Mr Davis had engaged in category C conduct but did not find that the conduct alone was sufficient to prevent him from teaching.  

However, the Tribunal upheld the Institute’s decision on the basis of Mr Davis’ character, citing a pattern of concerning behaviour from September 2023 onwards. This included:

• Repeated use of inappropriate language towards VIT staff.
• Public accusations against VIT, the Commission for Children and Young People, and the Department of Education involving serious allegations.
• Unauthorised entry to VIT premises, aggressive behaviour, and refusal to comply with directions.
• Continued contact with VIT staff despite formal instructions to cease.
• Social media posts criticising the VIT beyond reasonable limits.

VCAT concluded that Mr Davis had not provided evidence to satisfy the Tribunal of his suitability to teach and affirmed that it would not be in the public interest to renew his registration, at this time.

The VIT remains committed to upholding the standards of the teaching profession and ensuring that all registered teachers meet the requirements of professional conduct and character.

The full case outcome can be found on the Tribunal’s website.